<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Review of the Best Carrier in the World: The ERGObaby Carrier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truefatherhood.org/reviews/a-review-of-the-best-carrier-in-the-world-the-ergobaby-carrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truefatherhood.org/reviews/a-review-of-the-best-carrier-in-the-world-the-ergobaby-carrier/</link>
	<description>The Pursuit of Responsible Fatherhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babywearer Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.truefatherhood.org/reviews/a-review-of-the-best-carrier-in-the-world-the-ergobaby-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Babywearer Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truefatherhood.org/?p=402#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to pop in and say that infants should NEVER be carried facing forward in any type of carrier (which yes, makes Bjorns a no-no). Bjorns are known as &quot;crotch danglers.&quot; 
Facing forward makes infants feel insecure, allows them to be constantly overstimulated with no respite, can injure their spines &amp; is harmful to development. Google this subject and you will find many expert discussions on the matter.  Ergo baby, Boba, Beco and the other major manufacturers know this &amp; that is why you purposefully cannot carry your child facing forward in their carriers.
Example article (also featured on CBS news):

9 REASONS NOT TO CARRY YOUR BABY FACING OUT
by Elizabeth on OCTOBER 11, 2011 in BABY_WEARING, CHILD DEVELOPMENT, FEATURED BLOG

Recently Catherine Fowler of Australia made a comment that parents who face their babies out are “cruel and selfish“.  Actually for the record she said they were “inadvertantly cruel”.  I am not here to judge you ladies and gentleman; a walk around the block with your baby in the forward facing position will probably not reek havoc on your child’s development or health.  I don’t think any parent holding their little ones are cruel.  But when you start to weigh in on whether your baby should maybe change perspectives and face the world head on or not, here are some reasons not to let your baby face out, for your consideration- of course.

Carrying your baby facing out…

1.  does not support your baby’s legs-

Your baby’s legs should be pulled up to at least hip level if not higher. This is possible only if the fabric covers the whole back of the thigh, to the backside of the knee, or if the carrier has footstraps.  When your baby is facing forwards with legs unsupported, it isn’t that his legs are simply dangling,  his hips and spine are unsupported to and there is simply nowhere for baby to sit.

2.  makes it tough for the wearer to carry the baby-

It’s much harder to carry something that curves away from your body than something that embraces your body. The wearer has an awkward load and often ends up arching her back to compensate.  Babies bodies are naturally adapted to being carried facing you.

3. places your baby in an arched or hollow back position which places pressure on the spine-

Extending the back (like arching after waking from a nap), is not injurious or “bad” in and of itself.  The problem arises when you compress a “hollow back” under a load.  Placing an infant in a front facing carrier stretches the naturally convex rounded curve (see infant spinal development in upright transport paper) of his spine into a hollow back position.   With nothing to cling to, weak abdominal muscles, and retracted shoulders, the infant’s pelvis tilts backwards and is forced to not only carry weight of his own body but also to absorb the force of every step that the carrying individual takes- all on his little compromised spine.

3.  places undue pressure on groin and may chaff the inner thighs of your baby-

Chaffing is no fun.  Being suspended by your baby’s most sensitive parts is not ideal, especially for little boys.

4. may overstimulate your baby-

Baby’s can face their parents and still experience the world around them and take it in at their own pace.  It is very easy for a small infant to become overwhelmed.

5.  doesn’t support the head or the neck-

Positional asphyxia is possible when babies have no neck control and their chin falls toward their chests.  Little babies should never be placed in a position that can compromise their airways.  The US Consumer Products Safety Commission recently passed a law that the warning labels of forward facing carriers must state that babies should not face out until adequate head/neck control is acheived. The law does not extend to sleeping infants even though they don’t have control of their necks and supported heads while snoozing.

6.  makes thermoregulation more difficult-

The flexed position a baby assumes on his mother’s chest is more efficient at conserving heat than chest exposed (kangaroo care thermoregulation benefit).  The baby also has more fat cells (insulation) on its back side than front.

7. makes it harder to respond to baby’s cues-

With no eye contact it is harder to communicate with your baby, check their airways, see their spit up, see them rooting, and know their needs.


The mom is holding her son&#039;s legs trying to support them for lack of a seat. He is supported by two pieces of fabric over his groin. If it weren&#039;t for the fabric in front of his shoulders he would fall forward. Not very supportive.
8.  throws off the baby’s center of gravity-  Most often the wearer will intuitively stick out her pointer fingers for the baby to grab on to and stabilize himself or the wearer will try to support baby’s legs by lifting them up in the front. With no seat and nothing to grab on to in front of him it is tough for baby not to arch his back under the weight of his own body.

9.  may not be so wonderful on your back either-

Carrying a load with an arched spine will give you an aching lower back.

Carrying your baby facing forward is not the best option.  It’s not “cruel”, but it’s not ideal either.  Embracing your baby, or having them embrace you (like when you’re backin’ the baby) is what your baby is adapted to do and quite naturally the way to go.

Thanks &amp; help spread the safety word. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to pop in and say that infants should NEVER be carried facing forward in any type of carrier (which yes, makes Bjorns a no-no). Bjorns are known as &#8220;crotch danglers.&#8221;<br />
Facing forward makes infants feel insecure, allows them to be constantly overstimulated with no respite, can injure their spines &amp; is harmful to development. Google this subject and you will find many expert discussions on the matter.  Ergo baby, Boba, Beco and the other major manufacturers know this &amp; that is why you purposefully cannot carry your child facing forward in their carriers.<br />
Example article (also featured on CBS news):</p>
<p>9 REASONS NOT TO CARRY YOUR BABY FACING OUT<br />
by Elizabeth on OCTOBER 11, 2011 in BABY_WEARING, CHILD DEVELOPMENT, FEATURED BLOG</p>
<p>Recently Catherine Fowler of Australia made a comment that parents who face their babies out are “cruel and selfish“.  Actually for the record she said they were “inadvertantly cruel”.  I am not here to judge you ladies and gentleman; a walk around the block with your baby in the forward facing position will probably not reek havoc on your child’s development or health.  I don’t think any parent holding their little ones are cruel.  But when you start to weigh in on whether your baby should maybe change perspectives and face the world head on or not, here are some reasons not to let your baby face out, for your consideration- of course.</p>
<p>Carrying your baby facing out…</p>
<p>1.  does not support your baby’s legs-</p>
<p>Your baby’s legs should be pulled up to at least hip level if not higher. This is possible only if the fabric covers the whole back of the thigh, to the backside of the knee, or if the carrier has footstraps.  When your baby is facing forwards with legs unsupported, it isn’t that his legs are simply dangling,  his hips and spine are unsupported to and there is simply nowhere for baby to sit.</p>
<p>2.  makes it tough for the wearer to carry the baby-</p>
<p>It’s much harder to carry something that curves away from your body than something that embraces your body. The wearer has an awkward load and often ends up arching her back to compensate.  Babies bodies are naturally adapted to being carried facing you.</p>
<p>3. places your baby in an arched or hollow back position which places pressure on the spine-</p>
<p>Extending the back (like arching after waking from a nap), is not injurious or “bad” in and of itself.  The problem arises when you compress a “hollow back” under a load.  Placing an infant in a front facing carrier stretches the naturally convex rounded curve (see infant spinal development in upright transport paper) of his spine into a hollow back position.   With nothing to cling to, weak abdominal muscles, and retracted shoulders, the infant’s pelvis tilts backwards and is forced to not only carry weight of his own body but also to absorb the force of every step that the carrying individual takes- all on his little compromised spine.</p>
<p>3.  places undue pressure on groin and may chaff the inner thighs of your baby-</p>
<p>Chaffing is no fun.  Being suspended by your baby’s most sensitive parts is not ideal, especially for little boys.</p>
<p>4. may overstimulate your baby-</p>
<p>Baby’s can face their parents and still experience the world around them and take it in at their own pace.  It is very easy for a small infant to become overwhelmed.</p>
<p>5.  doesn’t support the head or the neck-</p>
<p>Positional asphyxia is possible when babies have no neck control and their chin falls toward their chests.  Little babies should never be placed in a position that can compromise their airways.  The US Consumer Products Safety Commission recently passed a law that the warning labels of forward facing carriers must state that babies should not face out until adequate head/neck control is acheived. The law does not extend to sleeping infants even though they don’t have control of their necks and supported heads while snoozing.</p>
<p>6.  makes thermoregulation more difficult-</p>
<p>The flexed position a baby assumes on his mother’s chest is more efficient at conserving heat than chest exposed (kangaroo care thermoregulation benefit).  The baby also has more fat cells (insulation) on its back side than front.</p>
<p>7. makes it harder to respond to baby’s cues-</p>
<p>With no eye contact it is harder to communicate with your baby, check their airways, see their spit up, see them rooting, and know their needs.</p>
<p>The mom is holding her son&#8217;s legs trying to support them for lack of a seat. He is supported by two pieces of fabric over his groin. If it weren&#8217;t for the fabric in front of his shoulders he would fall forward. Not very supportive.<br />
8.  throws off the baby’s center of gravity-  Most often the wearer will intuitively stick out her pointer fingers for the baby to grab on to and stabilize himself or the wearer will try to support baby’s legs by lifting them up in the front. With no seat and nothing to grab on to in front of him it is tough for baby not to arch his back under the weight of his own body.</p>
<p>9.  may not be so wonderful on your back either-</p>
<p>Carrying a load with an arched spine will give you an aching lower back.</p>
<p>Carrying your baby facing forward is not the best option.  It’s not “cruel”, but it’s not ideal either.  Embracing your baby, or having them embrace you (like when you’re backin’ the baby) is what your baby is adapted to do and quite naturally the way to go.</p>
<p>Thanks &amp; help spread the safety word. <img src='http://www.truefatherhood.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.truefatherhood.org/reviews/a-review-of-the-best-carrier-in-the-world-the-ergobaby-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>James Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truefatherhood.org/?p=402#comment-359</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to hear that other fathers enjoy the Ergo Baby Carrier.  I think it actually looks more masculine than feminine (as long as its not pink or lavender).  Our is camel color and I still think that is the best color.  It looks good even if the color starts to fade a little and honestly Khaki goes with everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to hear that other fathers enjoy the Ergo Baby Carrier.  I think it actually looks more masculine than feminine (as long as its not pink or lavender).  Our is camel color and I still think that is the best color.  It looks good even if the color starts to fade a little and honestly Khaki goes with everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nailfungusrelief</title>
		<link>http://www.truefatherhood.org/reviews/a-review-of-the-best-carrier-in-the-world-the-ergobaby-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>nailfungusrelief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truefatherhood.org/?p=402#comment-358</guid>
		<description>My Hubby loves the Ergo Baby carrier also. I still think it looks a bit strange with men carrying around the kids like that but nevertheless I&#039;m all for it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Hubby loves the Ergo Baby carrier also. I still think it looks a bit strange with men carrying around the kids like that but nevertheless I&#8217;m all for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.truefatherhood.org/reviews/a-review-of-the-best-carrier-in-the-world-the-ergobaby-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 02:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truefatherhood.org/?p=402#comment-328</guid>
		<description>I love my Ergo and my husband has biked with our son on his back as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my Ergo and my husband has biked with our son on his back as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.truefatherhood.org/reviews/a-review-of-the-best-carrier-in-the-world-the-ergobaby-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>James Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truefatherhood.org/?p=402#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Hi Heather,

It seems every time I am out with Lex and the carrier I see more and more ErgoBaby carriers and less and less Baby Bjorn carriers.  I feel like people are checking us out because they notice our &quot;older&quot; style carrier and that I am carrying a 3-year-old around comfortably (yes, he is 3 now!).  I like to think they are congratulating themselves on getting a carrier that they will be able to use with their little ones until they aren&#039;t so little any more.

Anyway, yes, you won&#039;t regret it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Heather,</p>
<p>It seems every time I am out with Lex and the carrier I see more and more ErgoBaby carriers and less and less Baby Bjorn carriers.  I feel like people are checking us out because they notice our &#8220;older&#8221; style carrier and that I am carrying a 3-year-old around comfortably (yes, he is 3 now!).  I like to think they are congratulating themselves on getting a carrier that they will be able to use with their little ones until they aren&#8217;t so little any more.</p>
<p>Anyway, yes, you won&#8217;t regret it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.truefatherhood.org/reviews/a-review-of-the-best-carrier-in-the-world-the-ergobaby-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truefatherhood.org/?p=402#comment-293</guid>
		<description>After a lot of research I have decided to take the plunge and get one.  Thanks for the review and info.  I hope I only regret not getting it sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a lot of research I have decided to take the plunge and get one.  Thanks for the review and info.  I hope I only regret not getting it sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

